All seven justices agreed that the state’s Constitution demands full legal rights for same-sex partners. But its ruling, 4 to 3, revealed a split in how to proceed. The majority said that lawmakers, not the court, should decide whether to call those arrangements a marriage, a civil union or something else. The three dissenters went further, asserting that gay couples, like their heterosexual counterparts, must be allowed to wed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8c0b6/8c0b64111f0b0f8684ae050bddfe5997b9e8b203" alt=""
No comments:
Post a Comment